Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing-DON'T POST UNLESS YOU ARE WATCHING THE HEARING  (Read 86944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline whartn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2009, 12:10:55 PM »
Is David in Rio or Brasilia? I would image he is in Rio awaiting custody of Sean.JP will address STF after decision doing his mea culpas.I will do anything for Sean.The LeS are in damage control.
Nonna is the evil one--cost the LeS much Reals.I am still amazed the older gents put up with her.

Offline sergiocesar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 39
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #16 on: June 10, 2009, 12:13:07 PM »
Quote from: clowermom;31106
I believe it works out like this:
1pm Eastern
12pm Central
11am Mountain
10am Pacific

I'm not sure of any other time zones. Hope this helps.
Looks good... has anyone been able to see a live feed? I get nothing but black screen.:cloud::mad2::burn:

Offline Teena

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2154
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2009, 12:15:11 PM »
Quote from: sergiocesar;31113
Looks good... has anyone been able to see a live feed? I get nothing but black screen.:cloud::mad2::burn:
Me too
Teena Duffy
Moderator
BringSeanHome.org

Offline M.Capestro

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2247
  • Twitter: @Capestro
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #18 on: June 10, 2009, 12:21:02 PM »
Quote from: sergiocesar;31113
Looks good... has anyone been able to see a live feed? I get nothing but black screen.:cloud::mad2::burn:

I don't think they'll start streaming until the court starts its session.

Offline Teena

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2154
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #19 on: June 10, 2009, 12:21:49 PM »
Quote from: M.Capestro;31119
I don't think they'll start streaming until the court starts its session.
Thanks M. I thought it was just me.
Teena Duffy
Moderator
BringSeanHome.org

Offline betsy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2009, 12:24:46 PM »
Teena - my media player was blank too so I assumed something was wrong with the connection because at home last night, I was able to see the actual website and I can't here at work.?

Offline teebee

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 17
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #21 on: June 10, 2009, 12:24:46 PM »
The anticipation is brutal... Can't wait until something appears on the screen.

Offline Sandra

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #22 on: June 10, 2009, 12:25:37 PM »
Quote from: M.Capestro;31119
I don't think they'll start streaming until the court starts its session.

This link: http://www.radiojustica.jus.br with Explorer. It doesn't work with Firefox. It is already on with some other subject.

Offline Bob D'Amico

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1489
    • Bring Sean Home Foundation
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2009, 12:33:37 PM »
Quote from: whartn;31111
Is David in Rio or Brasilia? I would image he is in Rio awaiting custody of Sean.JP will address STF after decision doing his mea culpas.

DAVID AND HIS ATTORNEY RICARDO ZAMARIOLA ARE IN BRASILIA AND WILL BE PRESENT AT THE SUPREME COURT HEARING.

THREE CASES ARE BEING HEARD TODAY BY THE SUPREME COURT. WE DO NOT KNOW IN WHICH ORDER THEY WILL BE PRESENTED.

NOR DO WE KNOW IF THE COURT WILL ISSUE AN IMMEDIATE RULING - WE CAN ONLY HOPE THEY DO.
Bob D'Amico

Offline caique mateus

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2009, 12:38:53 PM »
It's in orkut, posted by Priscila:
 
There was a "chamada" in channel justice:
 
"bom, eles foram imparciais.
apensas transmitiram o recado.
e expicaram que o min. Marco Aurélio não defende que o garoto deva ficar com padastro, apenas defende que ele deve ser mantido aqui no Brasil até que o processo seja julgado em última instância (que é esse julgamento de hoje, eu acho)"
 
Minister Marco Aurélio does not say that Sean should stay with his stepfather. He just says Sean should stay in Brazil until the last instance.

NJMomma

  • Guest
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #25 on: June 10, 2009, 12:43:18 PM »
Will someone be updating the forum live?
 
 
 
 
Stacey

Offline dana

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 251
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #26 on: June 10, 2009, 12:46:28 PM »
Quote from: caiqueemateus;31138
It's in orkut, posted by Priscila:
 
There was a "chamada" in channel justice:
 
"bom, eles foram imparciais.
apensas transmitiram o recado.
e expicaram que o min. Marco Aurélio não defende que o garoto deva ficar com padastro, apenas defende que ele deve ser mantido aqui no Brasil até que o processo seja julgado em última instância (que é esse julgamento de hoje, eu acho)"
 
Minister Marco Aurélio does not say that Sean should stay with his stepfather. He just says Sean should stay in Brazil until the last instance.

Please correct me if I am thinking this wrong--
 
STF rules under/for the HC - then it is not a custody case, so why are they allowing appeals?  I need some Valium.  My nerves are shot!!!

Offline caique mateus

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #27 on: June 10, 2009, 12:46:58 PM »
I think some of us will try.
 
I'll try... my english is limited, I don't have access to TV Justice (not sure internet wil work. So far....) and I don't understand technical legal things, but let's try!

Offline rcgracia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 372
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #28 on: June 10, 2009, 12:47:40 PM »
Let's pray for a miracle!!

Offline caique mateus

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
Re: Coverage of Supreme Court hearing
« Reply #29 on: June 10, 2009, 12:48:49 PM »
Quote from: dana;31143
Please correct me if I am thinking this wrong--
 
STF rules under/for the HC - then it is not a custody case, so why are they allowing appeals? I need some Valium. My nerves are shot!!!

Maybe one of our lawyers can enlight us. But it seemed to me they say they will not discuss the custody but just where Sean should stay until the last possibel appeal.