We responded to this 6 page appeal with 35 pages on why it was complete crap but earlier this week found out that yet another appeal had been filed. The first appeal I mentioned earlier in this thread was, by and large, an inappropriate one, much like many of the ones that have been filed in Sean's case. The correct type of appeal to file against a final State Supreme Court decision is an Amparo Directo and she filed an Amparo Indirecto. These different types are filed w/ different courts for different types of cases. In general the Indirecto is used for everything except appealing a final ruling against a high court decision. We hoped that it was by mistake and had good reason to think it was. Oftentimes it seems her lawyers have a team of monkeys on typewriters handing in anything that is halfway coherent, but they did file an amparo directo on the last day they were allowed to do so. We haven't seen it but know it's some 50 pages long. Although the arguments of her lawyers are nonsense it is actually oftentimes harder to argue against nonsense than logic. Logical errors are easy to point out but when the whole thing is poorly founded, convoluted nonsense it requires much more effort to untangle it... and so we begin again. For those that are counting that makes four amparos heard for a total of 6 trials so far (counting the family and State Supreme Court)... and the potential for many more.