After 3 years and 8 months, the Federal judge in Rio has scheduled a new hearing in my daughter's case on 03-Sep, potentially leading to a ruling.
Note - this is a legal process that I initiated with a private attorney in Brazil in 2004, this is not an AGU case. After mixed experiences with Ricardo Zamariola, I have now a new attorney Fernando de Carvalho Marrach and I communicated my objectives to him as follow:
1. Implementation of NJ Shared Parenting Agreement
- 03 months parenting time with father in U.S. per year
- child support according to NJ guidelines
- jurisdiction to remain in NJ
- this was agreed and signed by mother and father in NJ in 2004
2. Application of The Hague convention
This goes hand-in-hand with 1. Implementation..., but I want to stress that applying The Hague is very important in my case and in all other cases
3. Parenting Time with my daughter in Rio
I don't think it is realistic to assume the judge will apply The Hague (in the hearing 3.5 years ago she totally ignored it), so my secondary objective is to get parenting time with my daughter in Rio and a guarantee that I will not be jailed for not making child support payments.
Background: the NJ court suspended child support payments when my daughter was "illegally retained" in Brazil (which she is until today), while the Rio judge ignored the NJ order/NJ parenting agreement and determined in the hearing 3.5 years ago that I must make monthly child support payments. As long as I don't have such guarantee I am not really willing to go to Brazil.
The judge will potentially ask for mediation, while mother and father already spend 06 months in mediation working out a shared parenting agreement in NJ in 2003, and any more mediation now in Brazil would actually undermine The Hague. The Hague needs to be applied and the NJ agreement implemented!!
Honestly, my expectations are low, the judge will unlikely rule anything in my favor. But an order that totally ignores The Hague and NJ Family Court orders could actually help motivating the U.S. Congress to pass legislation for economic sanctions against Brazil, such as import tariffs. And of course an order that ignores The Hague and my rights could be appealed in the next level. So even if the order will not be favorable for me, any progress in this case will be good.
Now, the irony of this matter is, if economic sanctions/import tariffs are implemented and would actually be in place for a period of time, this would hurt my own business significantly, as I am an exclusive importer and distributor for a Brazilian brand in the U.S. Tough luck! But I am optimistic the threat of economic sanctions will already do, Brazil would be losing too much money if such sanctions would actually be in place for a longer time.
Klaus
pls. visit my daughter's website:
www.mariacarolina.com (over 9,000 visits so far)