They could not discern weither or not I truly had the right to say if his Mother could remove him or not. The custody papers CLEARLY state " Either party to these proceedings that intend to relocate the child subject to this Order MUST give 30 days actual prior notice before said removal takes place. "
They say" that even though the Order says she must give prior actual notice that it doesn't mean she can't remove him. "
Unreal, even with an article 15 declaration that states that the removal was wrong and she is in violation of 2 Missouri laws according to the definition outlined in Missouri statutes that say what she did is parental kidnapping and that she has parentally abducted Dylan as outlined in the Hague Convention.
Since I proved to them what it meant by a judge declaring it in an article 15 ,they would not present it but said I had to have an affidavit of law stating it to be Law.
Excuse me buy does this make sense? They want to ignore what a Judge having jurisdiction declares to be Law and ask an attorney from the same state to declare what is without telling the attorney making the declaration what the Judge has already declared?
Ya really. Well they got it and my solicitor says its in my favor but refuses to send it to me to see and states that Dylan is going to NOW be talked to by a Psychiatrist and his wishes be heard and for me to show up at court OCT 21st.
first off I don't believe them for a second. If they are refusing me access its either because its in FULLSUPPORT and wont let me know and are going another route, OR they have "something "however moot and are not telling me so I will have no defense when it comes time for court ...