wow.....they do say Hauge conention a lot in their, so much for not knowing about it.....their was one part, if im reading correct, it states their is only one reason to why they shouldn't follow the convention, that is if their is a situation of great gravity, that cannot be resovled through the courts.
-And I think the Judge is saying this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(or the silvia's)
Hmmm....don't see any situation in David's case,and that if their was,-couldn't be resolved through the U.S. court system, and if their was it would of been stated, of which it has not, therefore Bruna had never fulfilled that reason,
The defense to not return him to the father also seems to be alcholism, Bruna never had a reason to not return the child, and even though the defense of the mother stated alcholism, he still got his child back!
